Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Gould

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 1978No. 3218-2PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, A.C.J.

Fred Rhodes, plaintiff, appeals from a judgment which denied his claim for rents and for costs and attorney's fees, and granted costs and attorney's fees to defendants Maurice and Esther Gould. The Goulds cross-appeal from the award of costs and fees, contending that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to award them the entire amount claimed.

Rhodes is the owner of a piece of property located in a residential section of Spokane, Washington. The premises had been used as a grocery store for many years, and in fact, had attained the status of a "nonconforming use" in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Lande v. South Kitsap School District No. 402Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Spotts v. Westlake Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dombrosky v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Lake Washington School District No. 414 v. Mobile Modules Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API