Legal Opinion
Williams v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided November 19, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-3379PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEAR, District Judge:
This is a suit under the Truth in Lending Act for damages and attorney’s fees.
On August 27, 1974, defendant Bill Watson Ford prepared a Louisiana Automobile Retail Installment Contract and a note and chattel mortgage in connection with the sale of a used 1974 Mercury Montego to the plaintiff. The Contract served as the disclosure statement required by the Truth in Lending Act and had been furnished in blank to Watson by defendant Ford Motor Credit Company. The note and mortgage were subsequently assigned to Ford Motor Credit in accordance with prior arrangements…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Cheryl A. Meyers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Donald L. Bone v. Hibernia Bank and Michael ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- James W. Price v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Chuck St. Germain v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Rosie Watts and Robert L. Watts v. Key Dodge Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Kramer v. Marine Midland BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Iberlin v. TCI Cablevision of Wyoming, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.