Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 18, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

This is an action quia timet instituted by Mary Caroline Ratcliff and her daughter, Synthia Rose, and two sons, Melvin Rowe and Lilbern Rowe.

Mary Caroline Rowe was the wife of Lilbern Rowe, who was the father of Synthia Rose, Melvin, and Lilbern Rowe. After his death in 1883, Mary Caroline Rowe intermarried with W. H. Ratcliff, who departed this life in 1923. After the death of W. H. Ratcliff, she and her three children instituted this action in the Pike circuit court against Yina Coleman and Theodore Coleman to quiet their title to the tract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Everidge v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Robinson v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Noe v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Blackburn v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Thomas v. SchaadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Madsen's Est.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hatton v. Williams'Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Hale v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Jones v. WheeldonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Rose v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API