Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Schaad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellees brought suit in replevin to recover certain sawmill machinery which they had sold under a written contract dated July 11, 1919. The writing referred to described the property sold, which was a part of a sawmill outfit, and retained title until the purchase money was paid.

Appellant—the defendant below—filed an answer, in which the execution of the writing evidencing the sale of the machinery and the reservation of the title was admitted, but alleged that defendant had bought other machinery from plaintiffs, which was sold under a warranty, and that the machinery so sold did not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duffie v. PrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Southern Engine & Boiler Works v. Globe Cooperage & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Pratt v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Dillard v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Crockett v. McClure Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ratcliff v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Carle v. Avery Power MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. Cincinnati Coffin Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API