Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Foss

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Clatsop County. Defendant appeals. The facts arc stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The complaint in this action contains a number of facts relating to the transaction between the parties, beginning with the sale of land in Washington Territory by the-respondent to the appellant, the price therefor, the partial payments made thereon, and the execution of a promissory note to-the former by the latter, with J. H. Jones <& Co., for the sum of $2,000. It is further alleged in the complaint that said note was deposited in the safe at the Occident Hotel at Astoria, for respondent; that subsequently the appellant went to said hotel, took said note, and went to Portland and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buel v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Hoxter v. PoppletonOregon Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. RubelOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hornefius v. WilkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lanham v. ReimannOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Snow v. TOMPKINSOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API