Legal Opinion

Huff v. Seipold

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1969No. 37038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Otto Seipold having gained a jury verdict, Patti Huff in a motion for new trial alleged that misconduct of a juror ought to vitiate the verdict. She complained that the foreman had improperly used a Nebraska driver’s manual published by the Department of Motor Vehicles. The district court overruled her motion. She has appealed.

The bill of exceptions contains no verbatim record of the jury trial, and counsel have stipulated few items. The evidence concerns Patti’s personal injury claim arising out of two automobile collisions in Sarpy County, Nebraska, at 4:30 p.m., October 8, 1965. She was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sundahl v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Omaha Fair & Exposition Ass'n v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Whitehead v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kremlacek v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kremlacek v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API