Legal Opinion

Avitable v. W.M. Gulliksen Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 20, 2001No. 003522APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFremont-Smith, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Rosina Avitable (“Avitable”), a former employee at W.M. Gulliksen Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Gulliksen”), brings this action alleging sexual harassment against both Gulliksen and her former supervisor, Cyril Claeys (“Claeys”).

The action comes before this Court on the defendant Claeys’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, Claeys contends that Avitable’s failure to name him as a respondent in the heading of her complaint filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”), but only in the “particulars” section of that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Schaer v. Brandeis UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. McKinnon v. Kwong Wah RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Powers v. H.B. Smith Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AronMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  2. Dunfey v. Primetech Professional Services, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  3. Swenson v. Buffalo Lodging Associates, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API