Legal Opinion

Eiland v. Turpin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-0485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The issue in this legal-malpractice case is whether the rule we announced in Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1991), tolled the statute of limitations on the plaintiffs claims. The court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, held that it did not, and affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant on limitations grounds. 16 S.W.3d 461.

In light of our recent decisions in Apex Towing Co. v. Tolin, 41 S.W.3d 118 (Tex.2001), and Underkofler v. Vanasek, — S.W.3d - (Tex.2001), without hearing oral argument, we grant the petition for review without reference to the merits, vacate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Eiland v. Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eiland v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API