Legal Opinion

Tandler v. Saunders

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J. ) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

This is an action of replevin for a horse, buggy, harness, lap-robe, blanket and whip. The plaintiff’s' •case was that he bought the articles of one Theodore Schultze, who gave him a bill of sale, reserving possession for six months. Plaintiff testified that during the six months he was to have the use of the articles whenever he desired. Within that time they were seized by the defendant, who is a deputy-sheriff, and who claimed to take them as the property of Schultze’s wife against whom he had an attachment. The Superior Court held that the plaintiff did not have the right of possession,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bassett v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Garcia v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Essex v. FifeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Brant v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Ecker v. LindskogSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API