Legal Opinion

Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1984No. C3-84-258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant John Sumner appeals from an order refusing to modify findings which divided the physical custody of the parties’ eight-year-old son. We reverse and remand for findings.

FACTS

John and Nancy Sumner were divorced in May 1981, with the dissolution decree providing for joint legal and physical custody of the parties’ son.

Both parties have remarried and Nancy has moved to Pittsburgh. She sought sole custody and the permission of the trial court to remove her son from Minnesota. After a lengthy hearing, the trial court modified the physical custody arrangement by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Chapman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northern State Bank of Thief River Falls v. EftelandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Marriage of BednarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API