Legal Opinion

Utah Medical Products, Inc. v. Graphic Controls Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 4, 2003No. 03-1081PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

After a jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of Utah entered judgment in favor of Utah Medical Products, Inc. The jury found that Graphic Controls Corporation’s Softrans® device infringes Utah Medical’s U.S. Patent No. 4,785,822 (the '822 patent). The district court denied Graphic Controls’ motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the jury verdict. In a later bench trial, the district court determined that the '822 patent was not invalid for indefiniteness. Because the district court did not err in its determinations and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. On Demand MacHine Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. Ingram Industries, Inc. And Lightning Source, Inc., and amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Caterpillar Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Sturman Industries, Inc., Oded E. Sturman, and Carol K. SturmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. K-Tec, Inc. v. Vita-Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Afg Industries, Inc. And Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. v. Cardinal Ig Company, Inc., and Andersen Windows, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API