Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Watson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 7, 1982No. 444-81PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Nancy Watson appeals from the trial court’s decision and resulting judgment holding her liable to plaintiff-appellee Doris Eddy for the reasonable value of boarding two horses. We affirm.

Since the parties waived findings of fact we must assume that the trial court made all findings necessary to support the result. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Maryanski, 138 Vt. 240, 243, 415 A.2d 206, 208 (1980). In October 1978 defendant brought two horses to plaintiff’s stables and left them in her care. The animals were fed and cared for by plaintiff from that date until sometime in May of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chittenden Trust Co. v. MaryanskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Morse v. KenneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Kinsley v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  4. Valsangiacomo v. Paige & Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Finnegan v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. Ray Reilly's Tire Mart, Inc. v. F. P. Elnicki, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Cedric Electric, Inc. v. SheaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Beeman v. NesbittVermont Superior Court · 2004
  5. bloomer v. proctor coalVermont Superior Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API