Legal Opinion
Lizotte v. Johnson
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Doris Ling-Cohan, J.
“ ‘The fundamental requisite of due process of law is the opportunity to be heard’ . . . [which] must be tailored to the capacities and circumstances of those who are to be heard.” (Goldberg v Kelly, 397 US 254, 267-269 [1970].)
Pursuant to CPLR article 78, Irma Lizotte seeks, inter alia, an order reversing, annulling and vacating the decision after fair hearing dated April 29, 2003, which affirmed the New York City Administration for Children’s Services’ (ACS) determination not to provide petitioner foster care payments at the special rate. Petitioner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- United States v. MosqueraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Feliz v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KUSTURA v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Matter of Pagan v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kustura v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008