Legal Opinion

STEINBERG, ADMIN. v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1988No. [No. 88, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for $4,826.95 entered by the court in an action tried without a jury upon a guaranty. The guarantor contends that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the amended declaration, and that the proof was fatally defective in that it did not show any effort on the part of the appellee to collect the sums due from the primary obligors.

On September 9, 1955, the appellee entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement with Raphael H. Poiley and Rosal Metal Products Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Rosal), reciting that Gonzales and Poiley were the holders of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. Irving National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BairstowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. BairstowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crest Investment Trust, Inc. v. ComstockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Merchants Mortgage Company v. C. Warren Bogan, Margaretta C. BoganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API