Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Co. v. Horsey
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 10, 1939No. [No. 67, October Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.
The question on this appeal is raised by a demurrer to the declaration in the action brought by the Continental Oil Company, plaintiff, against T. Clayton Horsey and G. Clifton Cohee, defendants, on a contract of guaranty given by the defendants to the plaintiff. The court at nisi prius sustained the demurrer, and entered a judgment on the ruling against the plaintiff, which has appealed.
The action was begun on April 4th, 1938. There is but one count, which declares on a contract whose terms of guaranty are contained in a letter dated March 15th, 1934, addressed to the plaintiff and signed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hooper v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Booth v. Irving National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Eastern Shore Brokerage & Commission Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Nabb v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Slingluff v. Andrew Volk Builders' Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Giant of Maryland, Inc. v. State's AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- B & P ENTERPRISES v. Overland Equipment Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Mayor of Baltimore v. United Five & Ten Cent Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- United States v. Klebe Tool & Die Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.