Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Rhode Island Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 6, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trespass on the Case for negligence.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss a bill of exceptions presented to this court, on the ground that the bill and transcript have never been duly allowed nor the truth of the exceptions duly established, the bill having been filed in the Superior Court, September 24, 1906, and signed by the judge, November 10, 1906.

The privilege of review by a bill of exceptions is given by C. & P. A. §§ 490 to 497 (in.), and, as we said of petitions for new trials in Haggelund v. Oakdale Mfg. Co., 26 R. I. 520, 523, is contingent upon a diligent observance of the conditions imposed.

The following are the provisions…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union Fabrics Corp. v. Tillinghast-Stiles Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  2. Reddington v. GetchellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1920
  3. Spearing v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API