Legal Opinion

Beverungen v. Briele

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1975No. 592, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether a chiropractor may be designated a “Chiropractic Physician”.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In an action for a declaratory judgment and injunction brought in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City by appellees 1 (M. D.’s) against appellants, 2 (Chiropractors) the chancellor issued a decretal order on 25 July 1974 that Chiropractors “are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from the use of the term ‘physician’ by itself or in combination with other words, in any printed or written form.” 3 Chiropractors, aggrieved by the order, noted a timely appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osborne v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. O'Dell v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. Crider v. CullenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Maurer v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sebroski v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  2. City of St. Ann v. CrumpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Opinion No. (2001), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API