Legal Opinion

Brush v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Aypjpeal from Winneshiek District Oourt. Action in chancery to quiet the title to certain land described in the petition. There was a decree granting the relief prayed for by plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The petition alleges that the plaintiff holds the fee simple title absolute to the lands in controversy. The answer of defendants avers that the conveyance to plaintiff under which he claims the land was given to secure the payment of a promissory note executed by plaintiff’s grantor; *244that plaintiff executed a written agreement binding hiinself •to reconvey the land upon payment of the note, and that the transaction between the parties to the deed is in fact a mortgage. The original answer alleges that moro than ten years had elapsed after the execution of the note and deed, and prior to…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Borghart v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Bigler v. JackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Kelley v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McRobert v. BridgetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Nicodemus v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API