Legal Opinion

Corker v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1884No. 220PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Ax-'rEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Malcolm D. Jones, of whom Francis A. Jones, the appellee, is executor, in Ms lifetime was executor of the last Avill of Drury-Corker, deceased, and testamentary guardian of the person and estate of the testator’s son, Ernest D. Corker, the appellant, one of the devisees, then a minor, who arrived at age since filing the present bill. While acting as such, on July 24th, 1863, Malcolm D. Jones, as guardian, purchased a tract of land known as the Gilstrop and Watson place, part of the estate of Drury Corker, from the trustees of Mrs. S. C. Hart, a daughter of the testator, to whom he had devised…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Selig v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Dávila Rodríguez v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
  3. Woodall v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. In re SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API