Legal Opinion

Whitebird v. Eagle-Picher Company

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1966No. 5929, 6266, 6267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

■R’TNTlT'NrrS OF FACT ANT) F^Frír?rar^raF aw CO CL S O S

^ This is an action by the various plaintiffs in the three consolidated cases to recover from the defendant additional royalties alleged to be due under certain mining leases. After trial before the Court the following findings of fact and conclusions of law are entered for the consolidated cases:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I

The lands in question are Indian lands allotted to members of the Quapaw Indian Tribe and are located in Ottawa County, Oklahoma, in a mining area known as the Tri-State Mining District, Two sets of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Kretni Development Co. v. Consolidated Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Whitebird v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Myra Haynes, Pearl Garrett, Beatrice Thompson and Glenn Barr v. Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
  3. Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API