Legal Opinion
Locklin v. Switzer Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 24, 1964No. Nos. 14383-84PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
The question in these appeals is whether the denial of post-trial motions in the California courts of the Ninth Circuit1 for a new trial and to set aside judgment, and affirmance of denials on appeal, are res judicata of these later independent equitable actions in this circuit which attempt in effect to set aside the California judgment on “substantially most” of the same grounds raised on the motions in the California courts.
'We think the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois did not err in deciding that the California judgments are res judicata of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Albert Lapin and Lapinal, Inc. v. Shulton, Inc., and Tecnique, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Radiant Color Company, Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., Robert C. Switzer and Joseph L. Switzer, Counter-Defendants-Appellees. Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Radiant Color Company v. Switzer Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Air Purchases, Inc. v. Mechanical Coordinators Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Edward Bukstel v. Jehu HandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016