Legal Opinion
Albert Lapin and Lapinal, Inc. v. Shulton, Inc., and Tecnique, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1964No. 18775PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from judgment entered on motion of appellees, dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant brought suit in Los Angeles in the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, under'Rule 60(b) F.R.Civ.P. 1 to dissolve an injunction issued July 5, 1951 by the United States District Court of Minnesota upon the ground that changed circumstances had rendered inequitable the prospective application of the decree. 2 The injunction so issued ran in favor of LaMaur, Inc., which since has transferred its rights thereunder…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Zegura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Feller v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Pete Nicacio v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. And Public Citizen's Health Research Group v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.