Legal Opinion

Bolinske v. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court of N.D. (In Re Bolinske)

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2018No. 20170333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Attorney Robert V. Bolinske, Sr. appeals a decision of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court, affirming the Inquiry Committee West decision to admonish him for violating the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct and the North Dakota Code of Judicial Conduct. Bolinske argues the disciplinary procedure violated his right to due process. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2016 Bolinske campaigned for a seat on the Supreme Court. As part of his campaign Bolinske issued a press release alleging in part that certain members of the judiciary hid court records from the public. He claimed a petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Disciplinary Board v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Toth v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolinske v. SandstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Bolinske v. SandstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Bolinske v. North Dakota Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
  4. Petition of BolinskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Robert Bolinske v. North Dakota Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API