Legal Opinion

State v. Zumpano

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1956No. 4573PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Ey HUNSICKER, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of guilty rendered by the Municipal Court of Barberton, Ohio, for the violation of a zoning regulation of Norton Township, Summit County, Ohio.

Rudy Zumpano, the appellant, lives on Dutt Road, Norton Township. Immediately south of the home is the home of Harold Scritchfleld. There is a common boundary line between these neighbors 650 feet in length.

The Zumpano home is an attractive ranch type home on well-kept grounds. The Scritchfleld home is built 40 feet to the south of the Zumpano home and is set back a distance…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Leonards v. U-Jin Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. West Chester Township Zoning v. FrommOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Dsuban v. Union Township B.Z.A., Unpublished Decision (9-2-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API