Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1992No. Nos. 91-70331, 91-70423PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WANGER, District Judge:

Petitioners, Clair S. Huffman and his wife, Patricia S. Huffman, now deceased, appeal from the Tax Court’s partial grant of their motion for costs and attorney’s fees requested under I.R.C. § 7430, as amended by the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub.L. No. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3342, § 6239(a) (“TAMRA”), which allows the recovery of “reasonable administrative costs” and “reasonable litigation costs” by a prevailing party in a tax case. I.R.C. § 7430(a).1 The Commissioner cross-appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

ISSUES

1. Did the Tax…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hannah David v. Gina KaulukukuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Leonorilda Ochoa v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. (PC) Head v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Allen v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. Balanzar v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API