Legal Opinion

(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 3, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01663Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Introduction 19 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil action. Pending 20 before the court is defendant Shelton’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 54.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends 22 that defendant’s motion be granted in part and denied in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API