Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bowles Livestock Commission Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 5, 1990No. CV. 87-0-420PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STROM, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court after trial to determine the extent of liability, if any, of defendant Bowles Livestock Commission Company to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for sales of livestock made through defendant Bowles. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1819. The uncontroverted facts in this proceeding are as follows:

Plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (hereinafter “FDIC”) is a corporation organized and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. The Merchants National Bank of MobileCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Ron Grubb v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lisco State Bank v. McCombs Ranches, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1990
  2. Monfort, Inc. v. Kunkel (In Re Morken)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bowles Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Mercantile Bank of Springfield v. Joplin Regional Stockyards, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  5. Tallahatchie County Bank v. Marlow (In Re Julien Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API