Legal Opinion

Shaftic v. Com. C. & C. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1932No. Appeal 224PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Lubanski v. Delaware, Lackawanna & W. R. R. Co., 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 538; McGilley v. Markovitz Bros., 89 Pa. Superior Ct. 170; Lovasz v. Carnegie Steel Co., 266 Pa. 84.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The disposition of this appeal involves the construction and application of the commutation provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Law. Using general terms, we may thus state the question involved: An injured employe had an award of compensation at a specified weekly rate for a definite period; he died before half of the period had elapsed, leaving a dependent widow and children; during his lifetime he received appropriate weekly payments and, in addition thereto, more than half of the amount of his original weekly payment was commuted, by orders of the board, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Carnegie Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Shaftic v. Commonwealth Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Yeager v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Bush v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API