Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 1952No. [No. 142, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

The question raised in this Workmen’s Compensation case is whether the Commission erred in making a lump sum award of a fee to claimant’s attorney, payable out of the terminal payments due under a previous award, without allowing the employer and self-insurer a discount on such prepayment. The appellant does not challenge the authority of the Commission to make the lump sum award under Section 58, Article 101 of the Code or its propriety under the circumstances.

The facts are not in dispute. Jackson received an award for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability, aggregating…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Petillo v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Okmulgee Democrat Pub Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Bailey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Gagne v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  5. Matter of Cretella v. New York Dock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willis v. Long Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Chanticleer Skyline Room, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Hicks v. General Refractories Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  5. State Insurance Fund v. RenakUtah Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API