Rosenfield v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, P. J.
This proceeding in mandate presents the question whether the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1295, subdivisions (a) and (b), 1 concerning waiver of the patient’s right to jury trial, are mandatory or advisory.
For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the failure of a health care contract to contain the advisements specified in subdivisions (a) and (b) of section 1295 automatically renders unenforceable the arbitration provisions of such contract; section 1295 is mandatory and preempts the general provisions of section 1281.2 in the area of medical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Powers v. Dickson, Carlson & CampilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ceja v. J. R. Wood, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Cox v. Bonni, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.