In re the Estate of Schoenfelder
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
As is pointed out in the able memorandum of the attorney for the executor, the operation of section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act produces a somewhat anomalous result on the very unusual facts of the present case.
Unquestionably the underlying theory motivating the enactment was the award of the essential necessities for continuation of the family unit. The reason for the statute, however, becomes immaterial, if the effectuation of the unmistakable terms of the act comes in conflict therewith, and the remedy for the condition, if the question is of sufficient importance to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re DorseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re the Estate of McNamaraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Estate of BenjaminNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of JacobsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of MacnealNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Accounting of ColeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
- In re the Estate of VosburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of LevyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.