In re Estate of Imamura
Supreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands
1DissentTaylor, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent.
¶16 Contrary to the majority opinion, I believe Article XII of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands was never drafted with the intent of disinheriting Chamorro children. Put more simply, Article XII was never meant to deny Chamorro grandchildren a right to inherit their grandmother’s land simply because they are not currently a citizen or national of the United States. The majority’s holding has the effect of denying the appellants basic, fundamental due process and equal protection ofthe laws in violation ofthe U.S. Constitution.
¶17 The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Irving Trust Co. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.