Legal Opinion

Mkhitaryan v. County of Clark

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 12, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00708Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 SERGEY MKHITARYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01578-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8 v. [Docket No. 11] 9 CLARK COUNTY, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is a motion requesting screening of Plaintiff’s pro se complaint 12 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Docket No. 11, which is GRANTED in that the Court screens 13 Plaintiff’s complaint herein. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s complaint is 14 DISMISSED with leave to amend. 15 Courts screen the civil complaint of a prisoner seeking redress from a government entity 16 or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Bianchi v. RylaarsdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API