Legal Opinion
Eddy v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1938No. Civ. 11490PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff, Pearl Edwards Eddy, a minor of the age of 17 years, by and through her guardian ad litem, commenced this action against the City of Los Angeles and E. L. Vinsant to recover damages for personal injuries received by the minor plaintiff, a pedestrian, while crossing York Boulevard, a public street in the City of Los Angeles, in the lane marked for pedestrians, when she was struck by an automobile owned by the defendant city and driven by defendant Vinsant in the course of his employment.
From the judgment in favor of defendant city, plaintiff has appealed, and has brought up the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lucas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Lossman v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Floyd A. Wright v. United States of America, and Nathan Fletcher, Malcolm S. Segal and Does I Through XxiiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Maynard v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Cavagnaro v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Marshall v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Derrer v. Keeler Gold Mines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.