Legal Opinion

Julian v. Mattson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1985No. 85-227PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Appellants, Gordon Julian and Sara Williams Julian, husband and wife, appeal from the order of the District Court, Eighteenth Judicial District, County of Gallatin, granting the motion for summary judgment of respondent, George Mattson.

We affirm.

The Julians brought this action in District Court to recover damages for defects in construction alleged due under an oral contract to supervise construction. The District Court denied Mattson’s motion for summary judgment based upon the statute of limitation but granted Mattson’s motion for summary judgment because the activities for which recovery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Mattson v. JulianMontana Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. First Bank v. District Court for the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Caplis v. CaplisMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Zimmerman v. ConnorMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Taggart v. RutledgeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1987
  5. Springs v. First National Bank of Cut BankDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API