Legal Opinion

Taggart v. Rutledge

District Court, D. Montana

Decided March 23, 1987No. CV 82-96-BU-CCLPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LOVELL, District Judge.

This action arises out of Conoco, Inc.’s decision to sell as a “package” its properties in the area of Bozeman, Montana, and the subsequent sale to the plaintiffs of a single station within that package.

Plaintiffs (hereinafter also “Taggarts”), the owners and operators of the Four Corners Conoco station near Bozeman, filed suit in 1982 to recover damages from Conoco, Inc., and Continental Oil Company (hereinafter “Conoco”), and from Conoco jobber David S. Rutledge, for alleged federal antitrust violations as well as numerous alleged state law violations.

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pressure Vessels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Empire GasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  2. State v. PerryMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. E.T. Barwick Industries, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987
  4. Orlando v. PrewettMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ashkanazy v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API