Legal Opinion

State v. Damani

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 2009No. A07A1015-A07A1018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

The Supreme Court of Georgia vacated our original decision1 in this case so that the appellees in Case No. A07A1015, and the cross-appellants in Case Nos. A07A1016, A07A1017, and A07A1018 could supplement the record with “exhibits necessary to assessing the true and complete facts as they occurred in the trial court.” Damani v. State of Ga., 284 Ga. 372, 373 (667 SE2d 372) (2008). Upon remand, we ordered the parties to supplement the appellate record and to submit supplemental briefs addressing that record evidence, and we granted the parties’ request for oral argument.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Old South Amusements, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Brown v. Liberty CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Damani v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. State v. DamaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. State v. DAMANICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. State v. DamaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API