Legal Opinion

Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 4, 2010No. S09G1946, S09G1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari in these cases to address whether the seven video game machines at issue are illegal gambling devices subject to condemnation by the State, as found by the Court of Appeals based on the interpretation it gave to the phrase “a single play” pertaining to the noncash redemption options set forth in OCGA § 16-12-35, State of Ga. v. Damani, 299 Ga. App. 112 (681 SE2d 635) (2009), or whether the game machines meet the definition in OCGA § 16-12-35 for coin operated games or devices designed and manufactured for bona fide amusement purposes only, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Elder v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Mayes v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Fleet Finance, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. State v. Old South Amusements, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. State v. SinghSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Amusement Sales, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Amusement Sales, Inc. v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API