Haney v. Sheppard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
That equity will not take cognizance of plain legal rights where an adequate and complete remedy is provided by law (Code, § 37-120) is the universal rule and is not here questioned, but there are certain decisions of this court which, on casual reading, tend to indicate that equity will entertain jurisdiction to enjoin the maintenance of an obstruction of a highway as a nuisance, notwithstanding the legal remedy provided under Chapter 72-2 of the Code. The first of such decisions was Russell v. Napier, 80 Ga. 77 (4 S. E. 857). But as pointed out in Campbell v. Deal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Simmons v. LindsaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Georgia Pacific Railway v. Mayor of DouglasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Lockwood v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Russell v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. MauldinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Levinson v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Rahn v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- City of East Point v. Henry Chanin Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Atkinson v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.