Legal Opinion
Tomsic v. Stockard (In Re Salience Associates, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 3, 2007No. 19-10256PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by the Defendant, Robert Stockard. The motion is opposed by the Plaintiff, Tali A. Tomsic as Chapter 7 trustee of Salience Associates, Inc. (the “Trustee”; the “Debtor”). The Trustee’s complaint, brought under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b), 1 seeks to avoid a transfer made by the Debtor to Stockard within one year of the filing of the Debtor’s bankruptcy petition.
I. FACTS & TRAVEL OF THE CASE
The relevant facts are not materially disputed.
Prior to filing its Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Desmond v. Varrasso (In Re Varrasso)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- In Re Fulghum Construction Corp., Debtor. Robert H. Waldschmidt, Trustee v. Harry H. Ranier, Algin Nolan, and Ranier & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tomsic v. Sales Consultants of Boston, Inc. (In Re Salience Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007