Legal Opinion

People v. Staigers

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1928No. Docket No. 1627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was charged and convicted of the crime of forgery, thereafter moved for a new trial, which was denied, and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying such motion. The specific acts upon which appellant was charged with having committed the offense mentioned, consisted of the alleged preparation in pencil of a letter, to which he obtained the signatures of his employers on April 23, 1927, which writing he later erased, writing in lieu thereof with typewriter, upon the same paper and over said signatures, a contract of employment at a stated salary and commission, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Continental Nat. Bank of Jackson County v. Holland Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. People v. GranilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. GoodaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. CurtissAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API