Legal Opinion

Peruccio v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 15, 2008No. AC 27923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The petitioner, Marc Peruccio, appeals from the judgment of the habeas corut denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly determined that he had received the effective assistance of counsel. We are not persuaded by the petitioner’s arguments and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history are necessary for the resolution of the petitioner’s appeal. On November 9, 1995, the jury found the petitioner guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and risk of injury…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Kenneth L. Wilson v. Fred W. Greene, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Ben Gersten v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. STEPHEN S. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Weinberg v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Watson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Arroyo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API