Peruccio v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The petitioner, Marc Peruccio, appeals from the judgment of the habeas corut denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly determined that he had received the effective assistance of counsel. We are not persuaded by the petitioner’s arguments and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are necessary for the resolution of the petitioner’s appeal. On November 9, 1995, the jury found the petitioner guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and risk of injury…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Kenneth L. Wilson v. Fred W. Greene, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Ben Gersten v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- STEPHEN S. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Weinberg v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Watson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Arroyo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.