Legal Opinion

Antonio A. v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 18, 2014No. AC33746PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The petitioner, Antonio A., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court erred in denying his petition because his “constitutional right to the effective assistance of trial counsel, under the [s]ixth and [fourteenth [a]mendments to the United States [constitution, was violated.” We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts, as set forth in the petitioner’s direct appeal; State v. Antonio A., 90 Conn. App. 286, 878 A.2d 358, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926, 883 A.2d…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Toccaline v. Lantz, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Love v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  3. Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Arthur v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Ham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API