Legal Opinion

City of Bellingham v. Whatcom County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1952No. 32042PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The city of Bellingham instituted this action to recover sums of money for water furnished to Whatcom county for use in its garage and courthouse; also to secure a declaratory judgment that it is not obliged or required to furnish water free of charge to Whatcom county for use in its present courthouse. Judgment was confessed with reference to the county garage. It was conceded that the other two causes of action should be governed by the same rule of law.

The court sustained a demurrer to the first and third causes of action. The city declined to plead further and the action was dismissed.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Puyallup v. LakinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Halvorsen v. Pacific CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hutchinson v. Mt. Vernon Water & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Jones v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In Re City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API