Legal Opinion

Purscell v. TICO Insurance

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 24, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-04039PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants TICO Insurance Company and Infinity Assurance Insurance Company (collectively “Infinity”) [Doc. # 62]. After viewing all the facts in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, the Court GRANTS Infinity’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. Background

Plaintiff Ben Purscell purchased an insurance policy issued by Infinity and underwritten by TICO Insurance Co. The policy purchased was in effect from May 16, 2006 to November 16, 2006. It limited liability to $25,000 per person and $50,000…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Prairie Framing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Zumwalt v. Utilities InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Koger v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Ganaway v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ben Purscell v. Tico Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API