Legal Opinion
Lee v. Natomas Unified School District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 27, 2015No. 2:13-cv-00181-MCE-EFBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Chief Judge.
Through the present action, Plaintiff Brason Lee (“Plaintiff’) claims he was retaliated against by the Natomas Unified School District (“Defendants” or “NUSD”) for advocating on his daughter’s behalf with respect to the provision of special educational services. According to Plain- ' tiff, Defendants’ conduct in this regard ran afoul of both Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, (hereinafter “Section 504”) and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”). Currently before the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- (PC) Ellis v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Harry Gers v. New Roads SchoolDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Henderson v. Oregon Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Valli v. MayorkasDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023