Legal Opinion

Crossfirst Bank v. Vieste SPE LLC

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 13, 2024No. 2:18-cv-01637Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Crossfirst Bank, et al., No. CV-18-01637-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Vieste SPE LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Before the Court are Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 355, 356, 17 358, 362). Each motion raises the same three arguments (though some raise others): (1) 18 that Plaintiffs did not rely on the allegedly misleading statements in the Official Statement 19 (“OS”); (2) that Plaintiffs fail to identify any misleading or false statement in the OS; and 20 (3) that Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API