Legal Opinion
Pinkham v. Rite Aid of Maine, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 1, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.
[¶ 1] Gloria A. Pinkham appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Hancock County, Mead, J.) contending that the court erred by (1) denying her motion to strike specified portions of Rite Aid of Maine, Inc.’s statement of material facts, and (2) finding that Pinkham was not a “qualified individual with a disability” pursuant to 5 M.R.S. § 4558(8-D) (2005). Because a genuine issue of material fact exists concerning the essential functions of the job and Pinkham’s ability to perform those functions, we vacate the judgment.1
*1010I. BACKGROUND
[¶2] Pinkham began working at Rite…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Rice v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniels v. Narraguagus Bay Health Care FacilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Linda J. Clifford v. MaineGeneral Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- South Portland Police Patrol Ass'n v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Carnicella v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Beth Carnicella v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.