Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Waddell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 13, 1995No. 1 CA-TX 92-0010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

This is an action by federal employees Clark Kerr, Susan Morgan, Steve Allen, and John Udall (collectively, “the taxpayers”) seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 (1988) against the director and assistant director of the Arizona Department of Revenue (“ADOR”), both individually and in their official capacities, and ADOR itself (collectively, “defendants”) for discriminatory taxation.

Since 1985, the effect of Arizona law was to tax 100 percent of federal employees’ mandatory contributions to federal retirement plans, while exempting from Arizona income taxation most…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KillianCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Kerr v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Kerr v. KillianCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API