Legal Opinion
State v. Tallard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 28, 2003No. 2001-700PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Henri Paul Tallard, Jr., appeals the Superior Court’s (Smith, J.) denial of his motion to vacate, modify or amend his sentence on the ground that it is unconstitutional under the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). We affirm.
The following facts are supported by the record. After a jury trial in July 1996, the defendant was convicted of, among other things, assault by a prisoner. See RSA 642:9 (1996) (amended 2000). He was sentenced to an extended term of ten to thirty years on the assault charge pursuant to RSA 651:6, 1(h) (1996) (amended 1998), which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Petition of State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.